Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Testing nursing home staff is costly and uncertain. Here’s why

  • COVID-19
  • by Patrick Skahill | CT Public Radio
  • July 10, 2020
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Photo provided

Staff at RegalCare New Haven celebrate Spirit Day.

As coronavirus cases continue to surge nationally, more questions have been raised about Gov. Ned Lamont’s decision to modify testing requirements at nursing homes. And now, three legal aid organizations have signed onto a letter expressing concern on behalf of nursing home residents, arguing Lamont’s decision could lead to more nursing home infections and deaths.

In June, Lamont issued an executive order requiring weekly testing for nursing home staff. But a few days later, the governor scaled that back, saying testing staff wasn’t necessary if the facility was COVID-free for two weeks.

In a joint letter to Lamont, three legal aid groups say that modification is out of step with federal guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which recommends testing all nursing home staff, and says weekly testing for asymptomatic workers without known exposures should continue unless there is “minimal-to-no community transmission.”

“We don’t want to see what happened to nursing home residents be repeated,” said Kevin Brophy, an elder law attorney with Connecticut Legal Services, one of the groups signing onto the letter.

Brophy said the change has his clients — nursing home residents and their families — scared.

“What we’re concerned about is that you have staff that don’t live in the nursing home. They work in the community, and they could, unintentionally, bring COVID-19 into the nursing home,” Brophy said.

Infection rates at nursing homes have dropped significantly. But more than 2,700 nursing home residents have died from COVID-19 complications, according to state statistics, which accounts for more than 60% of the state’s total death toll.

Understanding the ‘toughest’ testing standards for nursing home workers

During a media briefing on July 9, Lamont said he believes Connecticut has “the toughest testing standards at nursing homes, probably in the country.”

But in fact, neighboring states have handled the issue of testing nursing home staff more aggressively.

In New York, where more than 6,000 nursing home residents died from the virus, Gov. Andrew Cuomo adopted stricter requirements.

“Nursing homes and adult care facilities located in regions that have entered Phase 2 of reopening (at this point, that is every region of New York State), must test or arrange testing for staff once a week,” said Jill Montag, a spokesperson for the New York State Department of Public Health, in an email.

In Massachusetts, state officials are requiring nursing homes conduct new baseline testing of nursing home staff no later than July 19.

After that, weekly or bi-weekly testing is required at varying degrees of intensity, even if a facility is virus-free, said Ann Scales, a spokesperson with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health in an email.

Sara Parker McKernan, a legislative and policy advocate with New Haven Legal Assistance, which signed onto the letter questioning Lamont’s order, said the CDC is specifically calling for weekly testing for asymptomatic workers.

Lamont’s order says weekly testing must resume if a resident or worker at a “COVID-free” facility is identified as having “a new case of nursing home facility-onset COVID-19.”

But McKernan said any pause in testing is wrong.

“The CDC specifically calls for weekly testing with the provision that ‘state and local officials may adjust the recommendation for weekly viral testing of [workers] based on the prevalence of the virus in their community,’” McKernan said in an email.

Deidre Gifford, acting commissioner of the state Department of Public Health, said Lamont’s modification was in line with CDC guidance.

When asked about the change Thursday, she said it wasn’t a loosening of testing standards. And she rejected any assertions that the change was based on testing cost.

“We didn’t relax the standards. We just clarified,” Gifford said. “It wasn’t a decision based on cost. It was a decision based on coming into alignment with the federal guidance.”

Who pays the ‘extraordinary’ cost of testing nursing home staff?

Right now, a combination of state and federal dollars are paying to test staff at nursing homes around Connecticut, according to the state Department of Public Health.

But that money runs out at the end of August.

Beyond that, who pays is an unknown.

“The federal government has been unclear regarding its commitments to paying for testing, an issue our state and many other states are facing,” said Av Harris, a spokesperson for the state Department of Public Health, in an email.

“This isn’t a Connecticut issue, this is a national issue,” said Mag Morelli, president of LeadingAge Connecticut, which represents not-for-profit aging service providers, including nursing homes in the state. “We’re really looking for some funding on the national level to be able to provide the testing that’s needed,” Morelli said.

In the past two weeks, at least 20,000 nursing home staff have been tested via Lamont’s executive order, according to Lita Orefice, senior advisor to the commissioner of the Department of Public Health.

So what are those tests — and their associated materials, time, and sample work — costing?

Right now, the state refuses to release exact pricing information on how much it is paying at least seven vendors to process samples collected from nursing home staff across Connecticut.

But it has disclosed an average for each test and its associated lab work.

That price tag is $117, which means the total cost of running those 20,000 tests for nursing home staff was more than $2 million.

“The cost of weekly testing can be extraordinary,” said Matthew Barrett, president and CEO of the Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities.

“Those would be … unsustainable costs to expect nursing homes to bear,” Barrett said. “Especially … coming off of, and … not really being on the other side of, the COVID-19 pandemic in Connecticut.”

Jesse Martin, with SEIU 1199 New England — a union representing workers at around 70 nursing homes in Connecticut — said he thinks Lamont modified his executive order because of the price of running those COVID-19 tests.

“We think it is cost,” Martin said. “Right now the state is only set to pay for nursing home staff testing through the end of August … it is going to be a fiscal cliff that many nursing homes are going to face come September 1.”

Morelli said throughout the ever-evolving pandemic staff have continued to show up to work, caring for residents despite having to navigate guidelines that seem to be forever in flux.

And that’s part of what makes mapping out any certain future for COVID-19 testing in Connecticut so difficult, she said. Everything is changing.

“I don’t look at it as the door being shut on [Aug. 31],” Morelli said. “But we really, really need to have the federal government step in and help us out. Help the state out and help us out with this cost.”

Connecticut Public Radio’s Frankie Graziano contributed to this story.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Patrick Skahill | CT Public Radio

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Ned Lamont’s year in the shadow of COVID
by Mark Pazniokas

Ned Lamont has been the face, voice, and interpreter of the COVID crisis, mourning deaths, explaining setbacks and cautiously celebrating.

Restaurants and other business can go back to full capacity on March 19 as Lamont rolls back COVID restrictions in CT
by Mark Pazniokas and Jenna Carlesso

Connecticut will eliminate COVID-19 capacity limits on restaurants, houses of worship, retailers and most businesses on March 19.

1,500 Hartford school staff to be vaccinated this week at pop-up clinic
by Adria Watson

Vaccinations are taking place Thursday and Friday. A second round will be scheduled in coming days.

With billions in federal relief on the way to CT, legislators assert their role in deciding how to spend it
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

With an unusual bill, state legislators are reminding Gov. Ned Lamont they have significant role in disbursing federal coronavirus relief.

How does the public option bill differ from Gov. Ned Lamont’s health care plan? Here’s a look at the two proposals.
by Jenna Carlesso

With the rising cost of care a central issue this legislative session, lawmakers and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration have each moved ahead with their own plans aimed at driving down prices.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion The public health bill no one is talking about, but should be
by Brian Festa

On February 16,  the legislature's Public Health Committee conducted a public hearing on two bills, S.B. 568 and H.B. 6423, both of which would eliminate the religious exemption to mandatory vaccinations for Connecticut schoolchildren.  The hearing was capped at 24 hours, depriving nearly 1,500 members of the public who had registered for the hearing their opportunity to be heard.  The vast majority of those who did testify, and who submitted written testimony, opposed the bill.  The committee is expected to vote on the bill as early as  today. 

Opinion Students need more resources, fewer officers
by Tenille Bonilla

"School resource officer" is just a nice way to say cop. But what students really need is more resource and less officer.

Opinion The Board of Regents’ changes must not shortchange its students or faculty
by Carrie Andreoletti, PhD

As a university professor and a lifespan developmental psychologist, I tend to approach my work from a developmental perspective. This means I aim to foster a lifelong love of learning and to help others find a sense of meaning and purpose, as well as confidence in their ability to reach their goals. My approach to higher education is shaped by my desire to provide the best possible education for my students. This is why the recent Board of Regents’ proposed changes at the four state universities have me worried.

Opinion How to close schooling opportunity gaps created by the pandemic
by Carol Gale

We ask school district leaders to trust your public servants whose daily work life involves assessing student needs and planning or modifying instruction to meet those needs. Listen to their voices, as we have, and allocate precious resources on interventions that will offer increased opportunities for Hartford students to succeed.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO