Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

New rule: Curbing state spending or masking looming deficits?

  • Money
  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • May 23, 2016
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

CTMirror.org

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy insists recently adopted legislation that restricts how  nonpartisan staff report future budget trends — including deficits — will help ensure state spending doesn’t increase “on autopilot.”

The measure will effectively prohibit nonpartisan analysts – but only in one high-profile report – from projecting all of the spending the state has committed to legally in future years and assessing whether Connecticut would have enough revenues to cover it.

But the measure places no restrictions on what the legislature can propose or adopt, nor will it prevent legislators from obtaining the material nonpartisan analysts cannot publish in their annual Fiscal Accountability report.

And the legislation will make it harder for the general public to track deficit forecasts similar to those that have plagued Malloy over the last four years — an effect that sparked criticisms from right-to-know advocates, the House chair of the budget-writing committee, and the top Republican in the House of Representatives.

“This is a critical, structural reform that changes how we will do business in the future, and it’s another step towards making the long-term reforms that we need to implement to be successful both now and down the road,” Malloy wrote in a statement.

The “reform” the governor proposed was wrapped into an omnibus policy bill approved in special session last week to help implement the new state budget.

Focus is on ‘current services’ budgeting

It directs the legislature’s nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis and the governor’s budget staff to follow a different methodology when projecting budget trends — in reports each submits to the General Assembly annually on Nov. 15.

Since 2005, the Fiscal Accountability Act has required analysts to break down a wide array of current and future trends covering spending, revenue, debt and economic growth.

When it comes to projecting future costs, nonpartisan analysts use a “current services” methodology. In other words, they attempt to determine how much it would cost to maintain all services offered now, and to cover any programs promised in current law but scheduled to start down the road.

The governor says legislators, fueled by these estimates, are too resistant to spend below the “current services” mark. His staff stopped following this methodology in its Fiscal Accountability Report three years ago.

But these projections do more than simply apply inflationary increases to existing programs. They also track deferred costs — in some cases large amounts — threatening future budgets.

What changes under the law?

The new law says analysts only should focus on two things: how much revenue the current tax and fee structure is likely to raise in the future, and how much certain fixed costs — debt service, retirement benefits, Medicaid and federal mandates — will grow in the future.

Those fixed costs represent just 40 percent of General Fund spending. What’s left over, the governor says, is what legislators could spend without raising revenues.

Administration officials argue that the legislature routinely waives some spending increases promised in statute, and “current services” projections don’t reflect this practice. For example, measures requiring full funding for non-education grants to towns have been temporarily suspended in most budgets for more than a decade.

“Moving away from ‘current services’ will help us ensure that government does not continue to increase spending on autopilot. As part of the budget agreement, the state will change how it does business, and give residents and businesses the predictability they seek as government works to live within its means,” Malloy said.

But Rep. Toni E. Walker D-New Haven, co-chair of the Appropriations Committee noted the measure changes nothing about how the state “does business” when the legislature and governor craft a budget.

Rep. Toni Walker, left, and Sen. Beth Bye, co-chairs of the Appropriations Committee, prepare to take a vote on a labor contract with the UConn Professional Employees Association.

Claude Albert :: CTMirror.org

Rep. Toni E. Walker, left

It imposes no limits on the spending officials can approve.

It doesn’t change what they can propose.

And it doesn’t even stop legislators from acquiring “current services” projections.

Nonpartisan staff still are required to develop estimates and issue projections in response to legislators’ questions at times other than in their Fiscal Accountability Report.

“If the governor wanted us to be more tuned in to this issue, to make us do more research, then he succeeded, and I thank him for that,” said Walker. The New Haven lawmaker supported and helped develop the budget but said she opposes the provision House and Senate leaders added at the request of the Malloy administration.

Walker also noted that getting “current services” estimates from analysts only offers information, and is not a directive. It didn’t stop legislators this month from adopting a $19.76 billion budget for 2016-17 that spends $1 billion less than the level needed to maintain current services spelled out in last November’s Fiscal Accountability Report.

No more deficit forecasts?

So what really changes? The answer: only what analysts can publish in one public report.

Between 2012 and 2015, the Fiscal Accountability Report from nonpartisan analysts repeatedly warned that spending was on pace to grow faster than revenues.

Every November report from the legislature’s nonpartisan analysts during that four-year period — which covers Malloy’s entire tenure excluding his first year in office — projected finances were headed for a deficit immediately after the current budget expired.

(See general fund projection reports from November 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 here.)

Some of those deficit projections topped $1 billion, and Malloy’s Republican critics used those reports to batter the Democratic governor repeatedly in 2014 as he campaigned for re-election while stating, “We don’t really have a deficit.”

But now that analysts only can compare 40 percent of the budget against 100 percent of revenues — at least in their biggest, high-profile report — there is no deficit to forecast.

Connecticut finished the 2014-15 fiscal year $113.2 million in deficit, and officials expect to wrap 2015-16 this summer almost $260 million in the red.

The administration defended its proposal last week by noting that the two leading Republicans who ran for governor in 2014, Tom Foley of Greenwich and former Sen. John McKinney of Fairfield, both argued that government cannot afford to maintain all services at current levels year after year.

But neither Foley nor McKinney proposed withholding that information from public reports.

And Malloy found value in at least one “current services” forecast during his first year in office. The governor spent much of 2011 citing the huge, $3.7 billion deficit he had inherited from Gov. M. Jodi Rell and the 2010 legislature to defend a major tax increase. That deficit was based on estimated current services costs for the 2011-12 fiscal year.

The Malloy administration did not address directly two questions posed last week by The Mirror.

How does restricting the contents of a public report — instead of proposing actual spending restrictions — significantly change the budget process?

And was the reporting change proposed to eliminate the budget deficit projections the administration has faced repeatedly in the past?

Malloy spokesman Chris McClure responded to both questions in writing.

“As the Governor has been saying since February, our state can no longer afford to exclusively budget on a current services model that routinely overstates the out-year projections because it is based on an expectation that spending will continually increase and assumes all policies stay in place and are funded the exact same way in perpetuity,” McClure wrote.

Although the administration has argued repeatedly that Connecticut “budget(s) on a current services model,” the budgets enacted in 2014, 2015 and this spring each appropriated less than the current services spending level projected the prior November.

“We must reform the way we budget in order [to] provide an accurate and realistic picture of the state’s finances – one based on actual revenue and actual expenditures – which will improve our state’s business climate, our prospects for the future, and state government’s ability to deliver services,” McClure continued. “To continue to rely on a model that produces results we know to be unreliable, simply out of habit, would be a disservice to the fine people of this state.”

House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, supported an alternative GOP budget that proposed spending well below the “current services” level next fiscal year.

‘Why would anyone want less information?’

But Klarides said there is no reason to stop analysts from warning legislators when current programs threaten to push finances into the red.

House Minority Leader Themis Klarides

Mark Pazniokas :: CTMIrror.org

House Minority Leader Themis Klarides

“Why would anyone want less information when it comes to forecasting budget trends, unless of course you wanted [to] keep bad news from the public, which is what the governor intends to do,” Klarides said. “It is amazing the lengths that this administration will go to restrict the free flow of information and the steps it intends to take to cloud transparency in government.’’

Walker also argued that without “current services” estimates, legislators cannot necessarily tell if the level of funding assigned to any program will result in changes, such as serving fewer people, or producing longer customer lines.

“We want full disclosure and transparency in the budget,” she said.

The Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information, a coalition of news organizations and other right-to-know advocates, also argued against the change.

“As a principle, government is based on budgets and money,” said CCFOI President Jim Smith of Oxford, who spent more than 40 years in top editor posts at eight daily newspapers in Connecticut, including The Courant and The Connecticut Post. “And democracy shouldn’t hide anything at all about the money that supports government. The people ought to know every nook and cranny about that money.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf A winner of numerous journalism awards, Keith Phaneuf has been CT Mirror’s state finances reporter since it launched in 2010. The former State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, Keith has spent most of 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. A former contributing writer to The New York Times, Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Rep. Patricia Billie Miller wins vacant Senate seat
by Mark Pazniokas

Rep. Patricia Billie Miller, D-Stamford, won a special election to the state Senate.

CT hasn’t started collecting new payroll tax from state workers
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Connecticut established a new payroll tax surcharge on Jan. 1 but still isn't deducting it from state workers' paychecks.

Lamont’s budget offers another round of tax amnesty
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Gov. Ned Lamont’s proposal waives penalties and caps interest at 3% over each of the next two fiscal years.

Final passage of ‘Crown Act’ comes on unanimous vote
by Mark Pazniokas

With a unanimous vote, Connecticut became the latest state to adopt legislation prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyles associated with race.

Senate sends data center incentives and town aid pledge bills to Lamont’s desk
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Senate endorsed an omnibus fiscal bill that lays the groundwork for a major boost in PILOT aid to many municipalities.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion How do we show that we value teachers? By listening to them.
by Sana Shaikh

When I was graduating college, my friends’ futures were brimming with impressive labels: Google, Facebook, McKinsey, Bain, PhD, MD, Fulbrights – the list of professional excellence was seemingly never-ending. When I said that I was becoming a teacher, I got puzzled looks – “Why would you be a teacher?” “If you can’t do, teach,” I heard. The nonchalance about my professional trajectory was unsettling. What’s more? Nothing has changed in the last ten years.

Opinion Sports betting in Connecticut: Can’t all the brands just get along?
by Bill Field

When it comes to legalized sports betting in Connecticut, it’s time that all of the parties gathered in a room and hammered out an agreement that works for everyone. The adage of everyone benefiting from a rising tide hasn’t resonated in the past two and half years. 

Opinion COVID-19 will push nursing home design forward
by Myles R. Brown

Over 40 percent of American deaths attributed to COVID-19 have been nursing home residents. Outdated nursing home designs contributed to the scale of this tragedy in Connecticut. Many design changes that could have prevented the spread of COVID-19 were already needed to improve the well-being of nursing home residents. The pandemic has made these issues impossible to ignore.

Opinion Let gig economy workers pursue options
by Nicole Petruzzi

In response to your February 22 story, “In an evolving economy, lawmakers take roles once played by unions:” Like many Connecticut workers, I struggle to make ends meet for my family, even when working full time. This last year has been a particularly hard time. I started looking for a part-time job to supplement my income, but I was worried that even something part-time would take away precious and needed time with my family.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO