Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano during the opening day of the legislative session.
Former Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano.
Senate Republican leader Len Fasano speaks about the proposals on Wednesday.
Senate Republican leader Len Fasano speaks about the proposals on Wednesday. Clarice Silber /

Senate Republicans outlined a list of proposals on Wednesday that would expand public-private partnerships, create new tax incentives – and possibly add to Connecticut’s coffers.

The lawmakers proposed several bills that aim to lower government costs by implementing public-private partnerships with state human services agencies.

State Sen. Kevin Kelly, R-Stratford, said private providers can provide more and better quality services than the public sector, noting residents are relying on a system that is antiquated and doesn’t meet current technological or consumer demands.

One measure would create those partnerships for the delivery of human services to low-income residents, elderly individuals, or people with disabilities, and form fraud investigations to detect those wrongfully using public assistance.

“It’s going to do more with less at a time when we have less resources and growing demand,” Kelly said.

Two other proposals would involve forming a public-private partnership council with multiple state commissioners to contract the delivery of human services, and privatizing certain Department of Motor Vehicle services.

Maribel La Luz, director of communications for Gov. Ned Lamont, said in an email the governor supports a lot of these ideas.

“He looks forward to working collaboratively with the legislature to ensure what’s best for the people and businesses of Connecticut,” she said.

Senate Republican leader Len Fasano said he is encouraged by Lamont’s general support of public-private partnerships, calling it huge common ground.

“I think that the fact that he has been thinking in that direction, I think is a universal change for this state for the better,” Fasano said.

Fasano described a new state income tax deduction for charitable contributions that would go into a “citizens in need” account within the state Department of Social Services’ budget.

The way it would work: a wealthy tax filer contributing $10,000 to help the state fight drug addiction could reduce his taxable income by $20,000. If that filer was paying the top marginal income tax rate of 6.99 percent, the deduction would save them almost $1,400 in tax payments.

Fasano also noted this hypothetical household could claim a charitable deduction on its federal income tax return as well.

“It is a trifecta of results with no downside,” he said.

GOP senators also are developing a plan to encourage major defense corporations to work with Connecticut-based subcontractors, such as engineering and architectural firms.

Those services, under the Republican proposal, would be exempt from sales taxation, and also would qualify big companies for research and development credits within the corporation tax.

Fasano said a fiscal note on the cost of these tax breaks hasn’t been calculated yet, but added the caucus is hopeful the proposal would stimulate enough economic activity — and corresponding growth in state tax receipts — to pay for itself.

Also Wednesday, Republicans renewed a proposal first offered in 2015 to finance transportation infrastructure improvements without imposing tolls or raising gasoline taxes.

The “Prioritize Progress” initiative relies heavily on dedicating a major share of the state’s borrowing capacity toward highway, rail and bridge work — even though it might necessitate lesser borrowing for municipal school construction, capital projects at state universities, and for other capital programs.

Former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, a Democrat, had argued on several occasions that the GOP plan would not allocate sufficient resources to both ensure highway, bridge and rail safety — and to make vital, long-overdue transportation upgrades.

Among the projects Malloy said would fall into fiscal limbo under the Republican initiative were the completion of upgrades to the “mixmaster” junction of Interstate 84 and Route 8 in Waterbury, the replacement of the elevated section of I-84 in Hartford, and the widening of Interstate 95 in southwestern Connecticut.

But Sen. Henri Martin of Bristol, ranking GOP senator on the Transportation Committee, disagreed.

“This is our way of saying which capital improvements are most in need,” Martin said. And while safety must be top priority, he added, legislators for too long have been unwilling to postpone other projects — municipal schools, new buildings on colleges campuses, or others — in tough fiscal times. “I guess hard decisions are going to have to be made.”

Sen. Alex Bergstein, D-Greenwich, said afterward she agrees with her Republican colleagues about the need for more public-private partnerships, adding that she proposed legislation to leverage private contributions for transportation infrastructure improvements.

Bergstein’s proposal also hinges, though, on establishing electronic tolling on state highways, which GOP senators oppose.

“This infrastructure bank bill is a perfect opportunity for Republicans to support two of their stated goals: increased public-private partnerships, and an improved transportation system,” she said.

Clarice Silber was a General Assignment Reporter at CT Mirror. She formerly worked for The Associated Press in Phoenix as a legislative and general assignment reporter. In 2016, she conducted extensive interviews and research in Portuguese and Spanish for the Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative team at McClatchy, which was the only U.S. newspaper to gain initial access to the Panama Papers. She is a Rio de Janeiro native and graduated from the University of Maryland’s Philip Merrill College of Journalism.

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. These ideas will never be implemented. They are common sense cost saving measures and they are coming from a political party trying to rescue the state from becoming another Detroit. Low information CT voters just showed last November they want nothing to do with either. We’ll have grocery taxes, fuel taxes, hospital taxes, electronic tolls, and exorbitant increases in the costs of living, but hey, at least we were able to spite Trump. Right.

Leave a comment