New Haven Independent
Sen. Marilyn Moore

State Sen. Marilyn Moore issued a puzzling statement Thursday night demanding that Gov. Ned Lamont, Democratic Party officials and unnamed authorities investigate her suspicions of absentee-ballot fraud in the Democratic mayoral primary she narrowly lost Tuesday to Bridgeport Mayor Joseph P. Ganim.

“I cannot stand aside and let the voters of Bridgeport be silenced,” Moore said. “Today, I stand with Bridgeporters, ​my community,​ to demand that the State and National Democratic Party, Governor Ned Lamont, and state and federal authorities conduct a full investigation of absentee ballots cast in the Primary election. The days of staying silent and therefore complicit in blatant voter fraud in Bridgeport must end now.”

State and federal law-enforcement authorities generally respond to sworn complaints or evidence of wrongdoing, not demands in press releases. The governor has no jurisdiction.

Moore’s statement made no specific allegations of wrongdoing, nor did it say whether the candidate or her campaign had filed a formal complaint with any law-enforcement agency with jurisdiction to investigate absentee-ballot fraud or whether it had surveyed any of the 1,200 voters who cast absentee ballots.

Neither Moore nor her campaign manager, Gemeem Davis, were available to answer questions. Ganim could not be reached.

Her statement caught the governor’s office and Democratic State Chairwoman Nancy Wyman by surprise. Lamont’s office offered a sharp reply: “There are multiple avenues that Sen. Moore can explore in regard to investigating or challenging election results. Those are powers that do not lie in the Office of the Governor.”

Wyman was unaware of the call for her to investigate until called by a reporter. She noted that allegations of impropriety at nominating conventions are handled by state parties, but the parties have neither the staff nor jurisdiction to review Bridgeport’s handling of absentee ballots.

Moore won a narrow majority of the votes cast at polling places, but her margin at the polls was overwhelmed by a 3-1 advantage in absentee ballots cast in favor of Ganim, who made a political comeback in 2015, a dozen years after a corruption conviction forced his resignation as mayor.

Unofficial results showed Ganim winning, 5,304 to 5,034.

“A clear majority of voters said no to the old politics, in a clear repudiation of a party machine that has stood in the way of progress for far too long,” Moore said. “This demand, however, was denied to voters. Questionable absentee ballots poured in, denying their voice.”

She had been expected to announce Thursday she would continue campaigning as a write-in candidate, a difficult but not impossible undertaking. Waterbury Mayor Michael Jarjura was re-elected via a write-in campaign after losing a Democratic primary in 2005. U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska did the same in a statewide race after losing a Republican primary in 2010.

Instead, Moore said in a 351-word statement that she was considering “every possible option” and made the demand for an investigation.

“Since the election, hundreds of Bridgeporters have called me and my campaign, demanding answers,” she said. “They want to know what happened at the polls on Tuesday. They want to know how absentee ballots again contradicted what a clear majority of voters expressed at the polls. They want to know what they can do, what we can do, to right this wrong. 

“Bridgeporters, community organizations and the press have been asking the authorities when will they step in and do something about absentee ballot abuse for months to no avail. Their silence has been deafening and is antithetical to American Democracy and the ideals, principles and values of the Democratic Party. “

Mark is the Capitol Bureau Chief and a co-founder of CT Mirror. He is a frequent contributor to WNPR, a former state politics writer for The Hartford Courant and Journal Inquirer, and contributor for The New York Times.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. Investigate…Yes, Please Investigate! The City of Bridgeport has a long history of voting irregularities in many past electorial races. Additionally, it continues to employ a Democratic Register that was complicit in allowing past voter fraud to occur. This cities voting system and it’s members needs to be scrutinized and cleansed of any improprieties. It’s time has come!

  2. Sounds like a sore loser. Demanding action by the Governor who has no jurisdiction demonstrates her lack of knowledge and being unfit to be mayor. Next, it will be racism. Time to accept that you lost. Period.

  3. You have to be incapacitated or out of town to file an absentee ballot in Connecticut. You must affirm this fact on the application for a ballot. Persons violating this requirement are subject to a penalty of $1000 and up to 5 years in prison. Persons who fraudulently solicit or otherwise conspire to interfere with the this process are subject to these same penalties.

Leave a comment
Cancel reply